• FHA Loans
• Jumbo Loans
• Refinance Options
• Home Purchase Loans

I am excited about this new site and think that it will bring a lot of value to people in the Seattle, WA area.

Related posts:

1. Mortgage Interest Rate Video The follow
2. Commercial Loans Website FOR SALE! Have you e
3. Commercial Loans Source Visit my c
4. 5 Future Mega-Hit Websites I am alway
5. Home By Midnight? Old post w

I like this idea and am going to try it out for my personal life. Here are 3 goals I want to accomplish by December 8, 2009:

• Get to under 11% bodyfat while maintaining muscle
• Make at least $3k a month on my side businesses
• Finish working through C#

Do you have any goals you would like to accomplish in the next 3 months?

Related posts:

1. Personal Trainer Today I wo
2. Great Flag Football Goal Line Plays The great
3. Work The word
4. Decisions Few people
5. Efficient Companies I am curio

Most people don’t realize it, but our healthcare system is already partly nationalized: the government blocks anyone from providing medical care except those it deems worthy. The reason healthcare in America is so expensive is that the supply is so dramatically limited by Byzantine government rules and regulations. Its one of the most fundamental principles of supply & demand: if supply is restricted, prices will rise. Bring back freedom to the medical care industry and prices will drop enormously.

Politicians have made healthcare insurance companies into the scapegoat for rising healthcare costs, which is false. Healthcare insurance companies essentially just provide a financial service to limit the risks of incurring large costs from medical care. Think of it like your mortgage: the more expensive your house, the higher your monthly mortgage payment. Insurance companies have not been driving up the prices, government regulations have. Insurance companies basically just match their fees with the overall cost of healthcare. Nationalizing the insurance industry will not make healthcare costs drop. Instead, healthcare will become a rationed good… you will have to get a bureaucrats approval to get your cavities drilled, heart surgery done or other medical procedures. Other countries with a similar system have long wait times to receive needed medical care.

Fortunately, Americans are finally beginning to stand up for themselves and fight back against unwanted & unneeded government expansion. I was happy to hear about the protests at town hall meetings against the cancerous growth of the government on American life recently. Hopefully, the onrushing tide of regulations and bureaucrats will be slowed but I doubt it.

Related posts:

1. Shortage of Doctors Raising Cost of Health Care The NYTime
2. AMA Reduces Quality & Quantity of Health Care Important
3. Businessmen are the Best Men I have got
4. Bailouts Continue to Grow and Spread Government
5. Free Speech Cannot Survive Without Free Trade Free speec

Related posts:

1. Siddhartha by Herman Hesse Read Siddh
2. Gmail & Old Emails: Excellent Self-Reflection Tools Occasional
3. HR 1966 IH: Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act The Meg
4. New York Times Scams Advertisers After havi
5. MIT Courses Online If you rea

Related posts:

1. Visible Technologies Performs Well In Forrester Wave Report The Forres
2. Google Wave- Really Awesome Email & Chat Google ann
3. Google Becoming Most Dangerous Monopoly In History I will pre
4. Go Twuck Yourself Are you on
5. How to SEO Google SearchWiki? The number

• Get traffic. It should be quite obvious to you that if no one reads your blog, it is impossible to receive comments.  You can increase traffic through SEO, PPC or by simply telling your social network about your blog.
• Engage your audience. Simply asking questions of your readers or posting polls is a good way to boost comments on your site.
• Write on emotional topics.  My most popular blog posts for commenting are ones that elicit feelings from my readers.  Sometimes those feelings are mirth, sometimes anger, sometimes sadness.
• Make commenting easy. If people have to go through a big registration process just to leave their two cents, you will not receive many comments.
• Open up personally. People are far more likely to engage if they can see a little bit of who you are as a person rather than just reading monotonous text.

If you liked this blog post on how to gain more comments on your website, please post a comment- it will be awfully embarrassing to have an article on garnering blog comments with no comments!

Related posts:

1. Guest Blogging Guest blog
2. 5 Tips To Make Your Blog Unstoppable In my jour
3. Blog.Joelx.com Stats of Note I have rec
4. New Blog Feature: Live Chat! In the rig
5. Blog Issues If you hav

Related posts:

1. Michael Hessemer Stands Trial Thursday for Allegedly Killing Fred Stephens III As many of
2. Human Spam I went to
3. “The Internet Must Be Destroyed!” Funny vide
4. Facebook About to Slaughter Twitter Facebook h
5. Go Twuck Yourself Are you on

I recommend that people use the simplest possible URL structure that they can make work with their website.  Ideally, you would only have a one-level deep URL like example.com/tree-article.  If you view my URL structures, they have a number at the end- I had to include the post number so that Wordpress wouldn’t end up having two articles with the same URL.  The number at the end of the URL structure is the post number, which is guaranteed to be unique.  Other than that small concession to smooth site operation, my URLs are as simple as can be and are human readable.  For example, when someone sees my site on Google or Bing or Yahoo, they can tell what my site is about by just reading the URL: blog.joelx.com/how-to-improve-your-url-structure/3377.

URL’s that are shorter also get a higher clickthrough rate so for articles that I expect to gain a lot of search engine traffic I try to make them one or two words added to the end, such as blog.joelx.com/demotivational-posters.

Related posts:

1. Writing Better Title Tags Title tags
2. Winning Visitors With Meta Descriptions Meta descr
3. Bing.com: Great Search Experience Microsoft
4. Guest Blogging Guest blog
5. Google Becoming Most Dangerous Monopoly In History I will pre

Related posts:

1. Idiot Comment By UAW Worker Marty Shawl Demanding Bailout I was read
2. Bailouts Continue to Grow and Spread Government
3. Detroit Automakers Bailout – Criminally Stupid Over the l
4. Bailout Debt Crushes U.S. Taxpayers I found th
5. Commercial Loans Website FOR SALE! Have you e

As a start, the best-compensated executives at the top of these big banks, hedge funds and private-equity firms should be treated like general partners of yore. If a firm takes prudent risks that pay off, this top layer of management should be well compensated. But if the risks these people take are imprudent and the losses grave, they should expect to lose their jobs. Instead of getting guaranteed salaries or huge bonuses, they should have the bulk of their net worth completely at risk for a long stretch of time — 10 years come to mind — for the decisions they make while in charge. This would go a long way toward re-aligning the interests of these firms with those of their shareholders and clients and the American people, who have been saddled with their risks and mistakes.

•

Why is so much effort being put into propping up those at the top of the economic pyramid — the money-center banks, the insurance companies, the hedge funds and so forth — when during a period of deflation like the one we are in, any recovery will come only by restoring the confidence of the people down at the bottom of the pyramid?

Confidence will return only when jobs can be found and mortgage payments are made. Even if Mr. Obama’s claim is true that his $780 billion stimulus package “saved or created” some 150,000 jobs, we seem a long way away from the point where those struggling to get by will feel like spending again. What happens when people buy a car once every 10 years instead of once every two or three, especially now that we taxpayers own such a big percentage of the American auto industry?

•

Instead of promising the imminent return of good times, why isn’t Mr. Obama talking more about the importance of living within our means and not spending money we don’t have on things we don’t need? We used to be a frugal nation. The president should be talking about kicking our addictions to easy credit, to quick fixes and to a culture of more is better (and Congress’s new credit-card legislation, while perhaps eliminating some of the worst aspects of that industry, certainly didn’t send the right message about personal finance).

Gas-guzzling S.U.V.’s, cigarette boats, no-income mortgages and private jets should be relegated to the junk heaps of history, or better yet, put in a museum dedicated to never forgetting the greed and avarice that led us so far astray.

•

Why is the morphine drip still in the veins of the financial system? These trillions in profligate federal spending are intended to make us feel better again even though feeling pain, and dealing with it responsibly, would be healthier in the long run. It is time to stop rescuing the banks that got us into this mess. If that means more bank failures on a grander scale or the dismemberment of Citigroup, so be it. Depositors will be protected — up to $250,000 per account — but shareholders, creditors and, sadly, many employees will, for the long-term health of the system, need to feel the market’s wrath.

•

Is there to be any limit on bailouts? We have now thrown money at the big banks, any number of regional ones, insurance companies, General Motors, Chrysler and state and local governments. Will we soon be bailing out Dartmouth, which just lost its AAA bond rating? Is there no room left for what the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter termed “creative destruction”? And what is the plan to get the American people out of all these equity stakes we now own and don’t want?

Furthermore, for government leaders to decide who shall live and who shall die in an economic sense opens them up to legitimate charges of crony capitalism and favoritism. We will benefit in the long run from a return to market discipline.

•

Why has Mr. Obama surrounded himself largely with economic advisers who are theoreticians and academics — distinguished though they may be — but not those who have sat on a trading desk, made a market, managed a portfolio or set a spread?

In our view, one of the ways out of this economic conundrum is to have experienced traders — not hothouse flowers — design incentives that will encourage the market to have buyers and sellers meet anew around the proper valuations of assets, not some artificial construct of a market propped up by a pliant Financial Accounting Standards Board or government-sponsored programs that appear to be virtually giving money away to hedge funds and private-equity firms so that they will buy assets they would not ordinarily buy. We’re not talking about putting the fox in charge of the henhouse, just putting people who know how markets function in the real world into the important seats in Washington.

•

Why isn’t the Obama administration working night and day to give the public a vastly increased amount of detailed information about what happens in financial markets? Ever since traders started disappearing from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in the last decade of the 20th century, there has been less and less transparency about the price and volume of trades. The New York Stock Exchange really exists in name only, as computers execute a very large percentage of all trades, far away from any exchange.

As a result, there is little flow of information, and small investors are paying the price. The beneficiaries, no surprise, are the remains of the old Wall Street broker-dealers — now bank-holding companies like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley — that can see in advance what their clients are interested in buying, and might trade the same stocks for their own accounts. Incredibly, despite the events of last fall, nearly every one of Wall Street’s proprietary trading desks can still take huge risks and then, if they get into trouble, head to the Federal Reserve for short-term rescue financing.

Here’s something that should change in terms of transparency. The most recent price that any stock traded for should be published online in real time for all to see. And the public should have access to a new type of electronic ticker that provides market information in language that all can understand, not just the insiders.

As for those impossibly complex securities that caused so much of the trouble — among them derivatives, credit-default swaps and asset-backed securities — the S.E.C. should have the power to make public all the documentation surrounding these weapons of mass financial destruction, including all data about the current costs of buying and selling them and the cash flow underlying them. We also need widely accessible, real-time reporting of all trades in the bond market. We bet Mike Bloomberg’s company could help design such a system for our benefit.

•

Why is the government still complicit in making the system ever less transparent, even when it comes to what should clearly be considered public information? For instance, it took more than a year for the Federal Reserve to disclose that it had agreed to pay BlackRock — the huge money manager that is 45 percent owned by Bank of America — and others $71 million in a no-bid contract to manage the $30 billion of toxic assets that JPMorgan did not want when it bought Bear Stearns in March 2008. And that is only one of the five contracts BlackRock has with the government as a result of this crisis — the nature of the other contracts remains secret.

Why are we not looking to change our current civil and criminal racketeering statutes, which are playing a perverse role in investigations of the crisis? Statutes meant to give prosecutors extraordinary powers of seizure before an indictment is handed up, or to impose treble damages, are appropriately used to break up rings of criminal behavior like the Mafia or drug cartels.

But a few clever prosecutors could use such laws to bring charges against people or firms in the financial services industry whose pattern of bad behavior played important roles in the collapse. Such outright seizure of capital or assets through use of the racketeering statutes can do much harm by giving prosecutors an unnecessarily powerful role in our capital markets. There must be a way to keep what is good about the statutes and to make sure they are not used for ill in trying to get to the bottom of the financial meltdown.

We are in one of those “generational revolutions” that Jefferson said were as important as anything else to the proper functioning of our democracy. We can no longer pretend that our collective behavior as a nation for the past 25 years has been worthy of us as a people. Many of us hoped that Barack Obama’s election would redress the dire decline in our collective ethic. We are 139 days into his presidency, and while there is still plenty of hope that Mr. Obama will fulfill his mandate, his record on searching out the causes of the financial crisis has not been reassuring. He must do what is necessary to restore the American people’s — and the world’s — faith in American capitalism and in our nation. Answering our questions may help us get back on track. But time is wasting.

The two authors of this article, Lewis and Cohan, are right on the money with all of these points.  If these issues are not addressed, things in the United States are going to go from fairly good to bad to a hell of a lot worse.

Related posts:

1. Generic Idiocy in Markets I am sick
2. Michael Lewis on Why Wall Street Collapsed Read this
3. Great Article on Financial Collapse Forbes was
4. Good Article on Stock Market http://www
5. A Modern Modest Proposal In these d