<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profound Questions To Consider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.joelx.com/profound-questions-to-consider/2141/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.joelx.com/profound-questions-to-consider/2141/</link>
	<description>The best online marketing blog by Joel Gross</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:44:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obamalutionary</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.joelx.com/profound-questions-to-consider/2141/comment-page-1/#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamalutionary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.joelx.com/?p=2141#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>1. Eyebrows might be less invasive to evaluate then pubic hair, but either would preferable. Or &quot;Bald&quot;.
2. No. Especially over an extended period of time.
3. Yes. And yes it does mean I would sell my loved ones lives. Mind you, I would charge quite a bit for some of you, but it would be prorated based on emotional attachment. 
4. No. 
5. &quot;You&#039;re quite obviously out of your mind running around on Joel&#039;s website in your underwear. Here take these pills- just a little something to calm you down. No, nothing to worry about!&quot;
6. Yes, at least they should. Would eat there more often.
7. Florida 35-24. 
8. Yes. If the situations were reversed, men would be emotionally needy and dependent and slightly unstable. And taken advantage of. 
9. Exactly as Plato said. 
10. Work on patient. His heart is open on an operating table- more severe than the guy just having heart failure. Get nurses to zap him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Eyebrows might be less invasive to evaluate then pubic hair, but either would preferable. Or &#8220;Bald&#8221;.<br />
2. No. Especially over an extended period of time.<br />
3. Yes. And yes it does mean I would sell my loved ones lives. Mind you, I would charge quite a bit for some of you, but it would be prorated based on emotional attachment.<br />
4. No.<br />
5. &#8220;You&#8217;re quite obviously out of your mind running around on Joel&#8217;s website in your underwear. Here take these pills- just a little something to calm you down. No, nothing to worry about!&#8221;<br />
6. Yes, at least they should. Would eat there more often.<br />
7. Florida 35-24.<br />
8. Yes. If the situations were reversed, men would be emotionally needy and dependent and slightly unstable. And taken advantage of.<br />
9. Exactly as Plato said.<br />
10. Work on patient. His heart is open on an operating table- more severe than the guy just having heart failure. Get nurses to zap him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plato</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.joelx.com/profound-questions-to-consider/2141/comment-page-1/#comment-8811</link>
		<dc:creator>Plato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.joelx.com/?p=2141#comment-8811</guid>
		<description>1. The color of their pubic hair. 
2. Yes, but such friendships are rare. 
3. I would take 1,000,000 for a day but not a year, this system cannot be used to effectively value life because it does not take into account the exponentially increasing value the more life you propose to take, on the last day of your life you are expected to be sick and your quality of life is expected to be low, making it easier to trade that day away. However, your quality of life is expected to be much higher 10 years before the last day of your life and should be worth more. Consequently determining the value of the last day of life does not provide an accurate value of each day of life. Not to mention that life in the aggregate is worth more than the sum of the days involved. I might trade you one day for 1,000,000 but there is no some of money which I would accept in exchange for every day of my life.
          The theory also doesn&#039;t account for the decreasing need for money as you get more and more of it. If I could have 100,000,000 in exchange for 6 months of my parents life I might take it, but if I had that option I would never accept 50,000,000,000 for the entirety of my parent&#039;s life because I would already be able to live extremely well off of the first 100,000,000.
4. Yes.
5. &quot;You must be cold in that leopard print underwear, here, take my jacket while I get us a cab.&quot;
6. No. 
7. Florida will win 24-21.
8. No. 
9. Losers know that their God is a jealous vengeful god who clearly liked the other team better and they don&#039;t want to piss him off. 
10. Depends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The color of their pubic hair.<br />
2. Yes, but such friendships are rare.<br />
3. I would take 1,000,000 for a day but not a year, this system cannot be used to effectively value life because it does not take into account the exponentially increasing value the more life you propose to take, on the last day of your life you are expected to be sick and your quality of life is expected to be low, making it easier to trade that day away. However, your quality of life is expected to be much higher 10 years before the last day of your life and should be worth more. Consequently determining the value of the last day of life does not provide an accurate value of each day of life. Not to mention that life in the aggregate is worth more than the sum of the days involved. I might trade you one day for 1,000,000 but there is no some of money which I would accept in exchange for every day of my life.<br />
          The theory also doesn&#8217;t account for the decreasing need for money as you get more and more of it. If I could have 100,000,000 in exchange for 6 months of my parents life I might take it, but if I had that option I would never accept 50,000,000,000 for the entirety of my parent&#8217;s life because I would already be able to live extremely well off of the first 100,000,000.<br />
4. Yes.<br />
5. &#8220;You must be cold in that leopard print underwear, here, take my jacket while I get us a cab.&#8221;<br />
6. No.<br />
7. Florida will win 24-21.<br />
8. No.<br />
9. Losers know that their God is a jealous vengeful god who clearly liked the other team better and they don&#8217;t want to piss him off.<br />
10. Depends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->